Wednesday, February 9, 2022

 February 9, 2022


The Olympics are on again. It seems like just last summer that we were watching Olympic updates…..oh, wait. It was just last summer that we had the summer games on our televisions.

And now here we are again with the Winter Olympics – which is actually a kind of a throw back salute to the past.  I say kind of, because it used to be that the winter and summer Olympics were always in the same year, with the winter first, and the summer second.

1992 was the last year to have both winter (Albertville) and summer (Barcelona) Olympic games in the same year.

Then, two years later, in 1994, the Winter Olympics were held again, in Lillehammer, Norway. This was a decision made by the International Olympic Committee in 1986. As one who’s always watched the Olympics, I thought it was a good idea, even if it felt weird to have the winter games again so soon that first time.

Now, of course, it just feels normal, and I would imagine that from an organizational standpoint it was a good decision. This way, you’re not taxing the officials to be super busy in one year only out of four.

David and I tend to watch more of the winter games than we do of the summer ones. Looking at our lives, that doesn’t make any sense, really. I did skate as a kid, but living out in a rural area, with only two friends close by, there was never any opportunity to go sledding or tobogganing—and no hills whatsoever close by that were available for that purpose.

And really, while I loved skating and would skate on the frozen pond-slash-marshy area that was across the road from our house back in the day, I wasn’t ever the athletic type. Activity was never really encouraged when I was a kid, and, not living in a town, there weren’t any organized local sports in my area. Or at least, there were never any that I knew of.

For David’s part, he never had any interest in hockey. He did live in a town, but he told me years ago that his father didn’t want him to participate in little league baseball or any other organized sport, because it would interfere with his golf trips with his buds and his week every summer at a cottage.

My mother did arrange for me to have dance classes and to be a majorette when I was about twelve, but I didn’t excel at either of those activities. I did twirl my baton in a few parades, but after a couple of years, we agreed—my mother and I—that I had gleaned all I could from that particular experience.

Despite our lack of athleticism, David and I both do love to watch the winter games! Monday night we watched some women’s freestyle skiing, I think its subtitle was “big air”? We also watched the mixed team ski jumping. We are looking forward to catching some curling in the coming week. Not the mixed teams, but the regular men’s and then women’s team event. There are the round robin portion that will lead into the semi-finals. And then of course, the bronze medal game, followed by the gold medal game.  

The first year that curling was reinstated as a medal sport at the Olympics (1998) was the first time we’d ever watched the sport, and we were both into it.

We also have watched a lot of figure skating in the past. We liked the pairs and the ice dancing, especially. We were yacking back and forth as we watched that freestyle event, and we both agree that these athletes make their sports look so easy. And we marveled as those women in the freestyle event went down the huge drop, some backwards, and then leapt and spun in the air, then landed and again, some backwards. We thought it wasn’t just toned muscles one would need to compete in that event, but nerves of steel.

I confessed, and David agreed, we would both be shaking on our skis and feeling ill just standing at the top of that hill, envisioning hurling ourselves down.

I suppose that one could class our viewing of the winter games as a kind of passive patriotism. We always cheer team Canada on, of course. But we also cheer on all the young women and men who have worked hard, and who strive to be stronger, higher, faster, to be the best that they can be.

The Olympics have served as a vehicle for worldwide friendships. They also provide us with the chance, for a brief time, for us to come together as people, our focus on something not egocentric, something that, at its heart and soul, is not connected to politics.

It’s a time to celebrate those who’ve had a dream, who’ve set goals, and who’ve dedicated themselves to a course of action. It’s a time to cheer on those who leave it all out there and lay it all down in the trying. Winning is of course the north star, but it isn’t the only benefit to be had from the process. Yes, the glory of the gold belongs to the winners, and I’m certain serves to motivate them.

But I also believe that those who have given their all but, in the end, fall short can still stand tall, and for one very important reason.

The odds were against them, and there were no guarantees, and it did indeed take long, tough hours over years where much would be sacrificed again, and again, and again just to reach the point where they earned the privilege to compete at the Olympics. Yet, despite all of that, they stepped up and gave it their best, anyway.

Or, to paraphrase the immortal words of Theodore Roosevelt, at least they failed by daring greatly, thus distinguishing themselves from those who never find the gumption to even try.

 

Love,

Morgan

http://www.morganashbury.com

http://www.bookstrand.com/morgan-ashbury


No comments:

Post a Comment